Working method

From intake packet to annotated return

Every audit follows the same spine so you know what happens between the day you send materials and the day you revise.

1. Packet intake

You send draft essays, CV, programme criteria or call for proposals, deadline date, and a short note on what still worries you. Incomplete packets are accepted, but findings stay provisional until missing pieces arrive.
2. Criteria mapping

Before close reading, we extract the programme’s published language into a map: required prompts, word limits, scoring categories, and eligibility notes. This map becomes the yardstick for every later comment.
3. Dual reading

Each written component is read twice — once for narrative coherence and once against the map. Margin notes mark thin evidence, unused criteria language, and contradictions across documents.
4. Priority list

Comments are ordered by impact relative to the days you still have. Cosmetic edits sit below structural gaps. We will say when a section is already strong enough to leave alone.
5. Findings call

For full dossier and grant reviews, we walk through the annotated packet together. You leave with decisions, not only markup. Statement-only reviews return written notes with an optional shorter call.
6. Your revision window

We recommend freezing major structural changes at least several days before the portal closes. If a second look on a single revised statement is included, it happens inside that window.

Ready to place a packet in the queue?

Tell us the programme, the deadline, and which documents are ready. We reply within two business days with availability and a suggested offering.